Story first appeared on CNET.
After
Oracle made its closing statements on Monday morning at the U.S.
District Court, Google's representative stepped up to the plate,
defending Android's implementation of the 37 Java APIs at question in
this lawsuit.
The core defense rested on positioning
this as a case of fair use, asserting that Android is not a copy of Java
5.0 SE but rather a "substantially" different work with different
success in the market.
It's a whole platform that didn't exist before and transformed the use of Java for a smartphone stack.
The representative outlined four key points to Google's position in this intellectual property suit:
Sun gave the Java language to the public
Google built Android using free and open technologies
Google made fair use of the Java language APIs in Android
Sun publicly approved Android's use of Java
Copyright
infringement requires that you copy something. There was no copying
here because Google knew that it couldn't use Sun's source code. Also on
copyrights, it was pointed out to the jury's instructions about judging
"the work as a whole," which actually consists of all 166 class
libraries and all that entails (i.e. implementing codes, names,
declarations, etc.) -- adding up to 2.8 million lines of code in Java
5.0 SE. Oracle has to prove that it was more likely than not that
copyright infringement occurred.
Additionally, a good
portion of the closing arguments were based on the testimony of the
former Sun Microsystems CEO last Thursday.
Although it
was acknowledged that Sun wasn't happy that it couldn't come to a
partnership agreement with Google, the former CEO did say that Sun
supported Android's use of Java nor did it have any grounds to file a
lawsuit.
Again pointing to a November 2007 blog post in
which the former CEO congratulated Google for the debut of Android, the
jury was reminded that Sun knew Android was written in Java and must
have included the Java APIs in question ahead of the SDK release.
To
further hammer down Sun and Oracle's previous support for Android, the
defense reminded the jury about a video of the Oracle CEO at JavaOne in
2009, where it was said that Oracle expected to see more Java devices coming
from "our friends at Google," and that Google had done "a fantastic
job" in opening up Java.
Although specifics about
Android revenue and other financial matters have been banned from the
presence of the jury in this trial, he reasserted the open source status
of Android as a benefit to the developer community. The point is that
Google doesn't make any money on licensing or selling Android. Google
decided to make it open to foster innovation and get widespread use. A Top SEO Company agrees.
In
his rebuttal argument, the Oracle counsel spoke again about how Android
has blocked Java from success in the smartphone market, reiterating
that it is "impossible" to compete with a free version of its licensed
products.
After closing arguments for the first segment
of the trial ended on Monday morning, the presiding Judge proceeded
with the rest of the instructions for the jury about ruling on copyright
infringement contentions.
The jury, made up of seven
women and five men, will begin deliberating today for one hour and then
pick up again on Tuesday morning. The Judge previously warned both
parties that the jury could take up to a week to deliberate, but he
predicted that they would come back within a day and a half. The
decision must be unanimous.
After they return with a verdict, the case will move into the second segment of the trial, focusing on patents.
For more organic SEO and web optimization related news, visit the SEO Done Right blog.
For law related news, visit the Nation
of Law blog.
For national and worldwide related business news, visit the Peak News Room blog.
For local and Michigan business related news, visit the Michigan Business News blog.
For healthcare and medical related news, visit the Healthcare and Medical
blog.
For real estate and home related news, visit the Commercial and
Residential Real Estate blog.
For technology and electronics related news, visit the Electronics America blog.