Organic SEO Blog

231-922-9460 • Contact UsFree SEO Site Audit
Showing posts with label natural seo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label natural seo. Show all posts

Friday, July 17, 2009

Google's results show slowing growth as online advertisers cut back

MercuryNews.com

As the toll of the financial collapse mounts, add one more victim: Google's go-go growth.

On Thursday, the search giant announced second-quarter revenue was essentially flat compared with the first quarter.

Google Organic SEOProfit rose, but that's because the Mountain View company slashed spending on computer technology and the giant data centers that power its business. And the company continued shedding jobs, after years of adding hundreds or even thousands of new Googlers every quarter.

Google's report adds to a mixed picture about the health of the technology industry. Earlier this week, Dell forecast that weak demand from big corporate customers would keep pressuring its profit, while Intel delivered a bullish report that led to a market rally Wednesday. And late Thursday, IBM delivered an especially upbeat assessment about the rest of the year.

CEO Eric Schmidt said Google's advertising business had stabilized. "We are not at the moment looking at the downward spiral we thought we might see six months ago," Schmidt told analysts in a conference call, noting that "a quarter ago, we had no idea where the bottom was."

But Schmidt could not identify signs of a recovery. The best news was that enough of Google's big advertisers have come back that the company was able to ring up $5.52 billion in revenue during the second quarter. That was $10 million better than the first quarter, when the company's revenue declined for the first time ever from the quarter before that and it looked like the economy was falling off a cliff. Advertisers, however, are spending less than they used to.

"For the first time, we saw a really big drop in revenue per search," said Jeffrey Lindsay of Bernstein Research. "We thought it wouldn't have deteriorated much for the first quarter, but obviously it has gotten worse." Revenue per search is a measure analysts watch. It goes down when advertisers pay less for ads or buy fewer ads.

The silver lining? The amount advertisers are willing to pay is "no longer declining now as a general rule across the board," said Jonathan Rosenberg, senior vice president for product management.

Google did manage to increase profit 18 percent as net income rose to $1.48 billion, or $4.66 a share, compared with $1.25 billion, or $3.92 a share, a year ago.

But that increase only came because of the cuts in hiring and technology spending, as well as an unusually low tax rate.

The number of employees at Google dropped by 378 to 19,786, marking a definitive end to a madcap hiring spree that characterized the company in the early years following its IPO.

Spending on capital projects plunged to $139 million. Two years ago, it was $575 million.

In an interview with the Mercury News, Chief Financial Officer Patrick Pichette praised employees for being frugal but said it would be wrong to assume that austerity had come to the Googleplex.

"We still have free food," he said. "We still have massages. There is still a doctor on site."

"It's mixed results," said Ron Gruia, an analyst with Frost & Sullivan who praised Google for its discipline. "It's the lowest growth rate since the company went public five years ago."

And if Google, one of the most profitable companies on the planet, is struggling, other smaller Internet companies are fighting for survival.

Schmidt and other executives described how Google has been pulling out the stops to turn YouTube into a profitable business and to begin selling meaningful amounts of display advertising — graphical ads that may soon increasingly replace the smaller, unobtrusive text ads that fueled Google's early growth.

"I think that is the next area where online advertising is going to shift and we are going to see tremendous growth," said Nikesh Arora, president of global sales. Arora said he was also pleased with the "trajectory of YouTube," which is selling more ads. "In the not long too distant future we see a profitable business," he said.

Google stock rose 1 percent to close at $442.60 in regular trading Thursday. But it fell as low as $427.67 in after-hours trading.

Friday, February 16, 2007

"SEO Friendly Content Management Systems" ... Don't Believe the Hype !

In recent weeks many of our clients and associates have been receiving an onslaught of emails, offers, and unsolicited marketing messages boasting of the search engine friendliness of new CMS Tools.

In reviewing these new CMS Tools and working with several of the most popular CMS Tools on a regular basis, we have yet to find a truly "SEO Friendly" CMS Tool. The marketing claims and "PR Hype" touting the SEO capabilities of CMS Tools is most deceiving and spinning out of control of late.

If you are considering moving a website to a new CMS Tool understand that despite all of the sales rhetoric from CMS developers, a vast majority of CMS tools lack core SEO principles in their design structure and thus still require the highly specialized dynamic-database SEO skills sets of a proven search engine optimization firm. If you plan on moving your website to a new CMS platform, also plan on engaging a skilled organic SEO company to fully optimize the dynamic website and CMS powered page templates and url renderings in order to achieve and maintain keyword ranking success in the search engines.

The list of qualified dynamic, database-driven search engine optimization specialists is actually quite small. Only a very tight circle of less than (10) established seo firms have the technical skill sets required to execute and provide the complex database optimization skill sets required to "open-up" the content(s) of CMS powered websites to the major search engine spiders.

Here are just a couple of topline SEO requirements, proven SEO principles and SEO Best Practices that many CMS Tools have overlooked and fail to accomodate:

SEO Shortcomings of Many Content Management Systems - CMS Tools.

URL Naming Conventions: many CMS Tools produce URLs that are either query-laiden or meaningless. Why even publish a page containing: ID=, Session IDs, or using generic URL names like department8.xml ? The URLs naming convention should at least attempt to indicate the content theme of the page whenever possible. Many CMS Tools populate pages with meaningless url names. If the only difference in your URL names is a number you are in for a long, steady, uphill climb, and roller-coaster results in the search engines.

W3C HTML Code Compliance and Validation: although many web and CMS developers beg to differ, it is essential that code validation principles and standards be adhered to for favorable Search Engine Placement. Invalid HTML page code is a contributing factor and can be directly tied to both securing and maintaining strong natural keyword placement. Many CMS tools publish error-filled page code that chokes spiders and potentially interrupts full page delivery.

"Loose" Content Management Systems: that refresh often can create tremendous confusion with search engines, resulting in "Content Trust" and site/URL fluctuation factors that prevent websites from attaining top keyword placement. Loose CMS Tools that "refresh" often can miminize search exposure and reduce reach on qualified, in-market users searching on keywords that define the company and brands. CMS powered websites programmed to dynamically update and change regularly are 'Red Flags' to the search engine spiders. Loose CMS Tools often leave "backdoor links" that conflict and compete with many "front-door" links on the same site.

Heavy JavaScript & Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Issues: many CMS Tools use layer after layer of repetitive Javascript code that turns off spiders and weighs down pages making them very heavy and difficult to index. Search engine spiders have to perform olympic feats plowing their way through the redundant Javacript calls and heavy CMS produced page code. The endless JavaScript errors make content location more diificult for spiders, inflate the size of the pages making the rendered page far larger than necessary and any foundational code errors, are being be multiplied by the sum total of pages, and as spiders struggle to crawl and dig deeper (as programmed) they encounter multiple levels of unoptimized, CMS-powered, error-plagued code. Many CMS Tools fail to properly define styles and guidelines in a single reference point thus eliminating redundant page attribute definitions that prevent spiders from quickly locating, crawling, and storing Relevant Content.

These are only a limited number of the topline site design elements that often keep CMS powered websites from performing well in the search engines on in-market keyword search phrases that drive new business. Conducting a comprehensive keyword analysis with (real search data from Google) PRIOR to converting to a new content management system or CMS Tools is also a great idea.

Marketing Managers, IT Directors, Webmasters, and Internet Publishers must consider proven Search Engine Optimization principles and SEO Best Practices before making any moves to convert to Content Management Systems and CMS Tools.

If you plan on moving your website to a new CMS powered dynamic platform, also plan on engaging a proven dynamic database-powered site optimization firm to fully optimize the CMS-powered website in odrer to secure and maintain premium keyword positions on popular keywords that best define your industry.